Did you know that BG3 players exploit children? Are you aware that Qi2 slows older Pixels? If we wrote those misleading headlines, readers would rip us a new one ā but Google is experimentally beginning to replace the original headlines on stories it serves with AI nonsense like that.
I read a lot of my bedtime news via Google Discover, aka āswipe right on your Samsung Galaxy or Google Pixel homescreen until you see a news feed appear,ā and thatās where these new AI headlines are beginning to show up.
Theyāre not all bad. For example, āOrigami model wins prizeā and āHyundai, Kia gain shareā seem fine, even if not remotely as interesting as the original headlines. (āHyundai and Kia are lapping the competition as US market share reaches a new recordā and ā14-year-old wins prize for origami that can hold 10,000 times its own weightā sound like theyāre actually worth a click!)
But in the seeming attempt to boil down every story to four words or less, Googleās new headline experiment is attaching plenty of misleading and inane headlines to journalistsā work, and with little disclosure that Googleās AI is rewriting them.
The very first one I saw was āSteam Machine price revealed,ā which it most certainly was not! Valve wonāt reveal that till next year. Ars Technicaās original headline was the far more reasonable āValveās Steam Machine looks like a console, but donāt expect it to be priced like one.ā
āMicrosoft developers using AIā? No shit, Sherlock. (That one was tacked on my colleague Tom Warrenās story about āHow Microsoftās developers are using AIā ā Google removed the two words that make a silly headline into a real one!)

I also saw Google try to claim that āAMD GPU tops Nvidia,ā as if AMD had announced a new groundbreaking graphics card, when the actual Wccftech story is about how a single German retailer managed to sell more AMD units than Nvidia units within a single weekās span. Wccftechās headline was relatively responsible, but Google turned it into clickbait.
Then there are the headlines that simply donāt make sense out of context, something real human editors avoid like plague. What does āSchedule 1 farming backupā mean? How about āAI tag debate heatsā?

Make no mistake, the problem isnāt just that these AI headlines are bad. Itās that Google is taking away our agency to market our own work, like if weād written a book and the bookstore decided to replace its cover.
We try hard to craft headlines that invite readers in, ones that responsibly encapsulate the news, ones that help you understand why a story matters right away and get you excited when itās justified. (Does my headline for this story seem the right amount of excited?) And yet Google seems to think it can just replace these headlines, in a way that might confuse our readers and think weāre the ones generating clickbait, since our publicationsā names appear right next to them.
Google does disclose that something about these news items is āGenerated with AI, which can make mistakes,ā but not what, and readers only see that message if they tap the āSee moreā button:

Itās too easy for readers to think we intentionally send our stories to Google Discover with these headlines.
The good news is, this is a Google experiment. If thereās enough backlash, the company probably wonāt proceed. āThese screenshots show a small UI experiment for a subset of Discover users,ā Google spokesperson Mallory Deleon tells The Verge. āWe are testing a new design that changes the placement of existing headlines to make topic details easier to digest before they explore links from across the web.ā
But the overall trend at Google has been to prioritize its own products at the expense of sending clicks to news websites. While the company swears it isnāt destroying the web with AI search, youād be hard-pressed to find a news outlet that agrees, and even Google has admitted in court that āthe open web is already in rapid decline.ā
Itās the reason The Verge now has a subscription: We canāt survive Google Zero without your help.
Read the full article here