Buying a new CPU in 2024 gives you a lot of exciting options. From powerful processors for work and gaming, budget chips that punch well above their weight, and some incredibly efficient options that are perfect for small builds. That’s what makes the modern CPU landscape so exciting: You don’t just need to buy the best processor you can afford.
The right CPU for you is one that can do everything you need right now, and do it well, while also providing some future-proofing, and ideally, a clear upgrade path. Here’s how to buy a CPU in 2024.
CPU specs, explained
Aside from the manufacturer, the main point of consideration when you buy a CPU is going to be the specifications of the processor. This means cores, threads, clock speeds, and cache.
As with many things in the world of computing, the general rule of thumb is “the more, the better,” but that doesn’t mean you need to spend money on a high-end CPU if all you’re doing is some light gaming. You don’t need one of the best CPUs for gaming, if you’re looking to use your PC exclusively for work.
If you want to gain an understanding of the way processors work, we’ll tell you everything you need to know below. However, if you’d rather just get down to business and hear about the different options that are available to you, you can skip forward to the next section that discusses the differences between AMD and Intel.
Cores and threads
Cores are like individual processors of their own, all packed together on the same chip. Traditionally, they can perform one task each at a time, meaning that more cores make a processor better at multitasking. Modern software is far better at taking advantage of more cores at once to do the same job, so more cores can make some software run faster, too.
Threads are the number of tasks that a CPU can conduct at any one time. Many modern processors feature simultaneous multithreading (called hyperthreading on older Intel CPUs), which lets processors leverage spare core performance for additional tasks. That’s why you’ll often see a CPU listed with eight cores and 16 threads or 12 cores and 24 threads. These additional threads aren’t as fast as the cores themselves — as they are effectively leveraging parts of the CPU that are underused — but they do typically improve performance by a noticeable margin.
It’s noteworthy, then, that Intel’s Arrow Lake Core Ultra 200 processors don’t feature SMT at all, instead relying on greater per-core performance to provide similar multi-threading capabilities as CPUs with greater thread support.
Some software can leverage more cores and threads than others, making the number of cores and threads that your CPU has a big indicator of potential performance. Having more cores than you need doesn’t speed things up beyond the limits of what the software can handle, and it can lead to your individual cores not being as fast as those in chips with smaller numbers.
Clocks and IPC
Another major consideration with CPUs is clock speed. This is the megahertz (MHz) and gigahertz (GHz) rating and represents how many collections of tasks a processor can perform each second. It’s a fair representation of the speed of individual cores, though it doesn’t tell the whole story. If two processors from the same generation have the same number of cores, but one has a higher clock speed, it will perform faster.
Since higher clock speeds mean individual cores run faster, that can make chips with higher clock speeds but fewer cores perform better in certain applications that can’t make use of higher core and thread counts.
CPUs also have different instructions per clock (IPC) ratings. That’s the number of tasks it can perform in each clock cycle (each second, noted by the clock speed), and it’s dependent on the underlying architecture.
While this might seem a little confusing, it highlights the importance of looking at individual reviews for processors. Head-to-heads, where two CPUs are pitted against each other in comparable tests, are also a great way to see how they perform in the real world. We have a few such comparisons, such as a real battle of the Titans that compares the 7800X3D and Core Ultra 285K.
If you want a good rule of thumb, CPUs with higher clock speeds and newer architectures are faster at just about everything, but for productivity tasks, a modern one with more cores will usually be quicker.
CPU cache
The CPU cache is yet another spec that’s worth looking at. The cache is a small amount of very fast memory that is built directly onto the processor, and it’s responsible for storing information that the CPU needs to frequently go back to. Embedding the cache onto the chip means that the information is retrieved quicker than if your computer had to fetch it from the system’s main RAM.
The two types of cache that matter when you shop are the L2 and the L3, and CPUs typically have larger L3 caches than L2. Typically, each CPU core has its own allotment of L2 cache, but the L3 cache is shared among all cores.
You won’t be surprised to hear that the more cache your CPU has, the better. Although you don’t need massive amounts of it for day-to-day uses, it can have a dramatic impact on gaming, which is the why AMD’s 3D V-Cache CPUs, like the 7800X3D and 7950X3D are some of the best for gaming.
Look out for the Ryzen 9000 X3D CPUs later this year. They’re likely to steal the top spot for gaming once again.
Intel or AMD?
Now that we’ve covered what all those different terms mean, let’s see how Team Red (AMD) and Team Blue (Intel) utilize them to deliver powerful processors.
If you’re buying a processor, you essentially have two choices — Intel and AMD. Apple also has its own processor type, called the M chip, but those are not standalone CPUs that you can put inside your PC. Instead, you’ll find them in various Macs and MacBooks. As they’re irrelevant to this article, we’ll focus on Intel and AMD instead.
Intel and AMD have a longstanding rivalry, and though both have had their downturns, in 2024 these two chip companies are hotly competitive with one another, making either a solid choice for almost anyone.
There are several differences between AMD and Intel. Each manufacturer equips its processors with different capabilities, but they have a lot of similarities in the way they work. However, certain design choices still set them apart, and the pricing is another factor.
Let’s take a deep dive into Intel and AMD.
Intel
Intel has been around for years and years, and it can usually be relied on to release new CPUs once a year. The last couple of years saw the rise of the Intel Alder Lake, followed by Intel Raptor Lake in 2022 and its 14th generation refresh in 2023. The latest desktop release is Intel Arrow Lake.
Intel makes CPUs both for desktops and for laptops. Some of Intel’s processors come with integrated graphics and others don’t, meaning you’ll also need to buy a discrete GPU to match. Moreover, you can overclock some Intel chips, meaning that their clock speed can be adjusted higher at the cost of increased power consumption — but this option isn’t available on every CPU.
Where some AMD chips go all-in on the clock speed and the cache size, Intel has been stacking up on cores. Comparing AMD and Intel may sometimes reveal that Intel has an edge in productivity-related tasks thanks to those higher core counts.
Intel’s latest flagship CPU is the Core Ultra 285K, and though it is the fastest productivity chip Intel has ever made, it’s not its fastest CPU for gaming. That award is still held by the last-generation 14900K. The newer CPU is far more efficient, though, and manages a lot without hyper-threading, but it’s not a CPU we’d readily recommend.
Intel’s midrange 245K is even harder to recommend. That leaves older midrange CPUs like the Core i5-13600K, which come with 14 cores, to make the value proposition.
Since the release of Intel Alder Lake (12th Gen), Intel has been using a hybrid core structure in its processors. This means that instead of using a single core type, it splits cores into performance (P) cores and efficiency (E) cores. The CPU will often have more efficiency cores than performance cores.
P-cores are designed to handle heavy-duty tasks, while E-cores are left to handle background tasks that don’t require the full power of your processor. P-cores also reach higher clock speeds than E-cores.
It’s worth noting that Intel CPUs tend to be a little more expensive than AMD, although things have largely evened out in the last couple of years. If you’re choosing between two manufacturers, Intel’s current lineup just isn’t that impressive compared to AMD’s Ryzen 9000 alternative. While Intel’s top chips may hold some leads in productivity, AMD’s CPUs are more consistent, and easily steal the top spot for gaming, and often at a more affordable price, too.
AMD
The last few years have mostly been good for AMD. After slipping into irrelevant territory during the time of its Athlon and FX processors, AMD managed to claw its way back up with the release of the Ryzen CPUs. It also made a smaller, but significant, comeback in the GPU arena with RDNA 2 and RDNA 3.
These days, with Ryzen chips now widely available, AMD is on an upswing. Its processors aren’t just relevant, but they are also often the go-to for gaming builds. AMD has also carved out a solid niche for itself in the server and workstation segments with its Threadripper CPUs.
AMD’s latest CPU lineups include the latest Ryzen 9000 (Zen 5) series of processors, and the slightly-older Ryzen 7000-series (Zen 4), which includes processors ranging from budget to high-end. There’s also still Ryzen 5000 (Zen 3) CPUs available for sale, and they offer excellent value for money for budgets workers and gamers.
As far as core counts go, AMD isn’t chasing the highest numbers and instead opts for more cache or higher clock speeds. However, only Intel has a processor that hits 6GHz out of the box — the Core i9-14900KS — but most users don’t need that kind of frequency, anyway.
AMD’s top processor, the Ryzen 9 9950X, maxes out at 16 cores and 32 threads. It’s a powerhouse of a CPU, much the way Intel’s top chips are — but gamers might find more interest in a different range of AMD processors.
Not too long ago, AMD introduced the 3D V-Cache. This is an additional chiplet stacked on top of the CPU that’s filled with additional cache. This drastically boosts CPU cache sizes, and instead of adding this to every CPU (which, frankly, wouldn’t be necessary), AMD releases these special chips under the “X3D” lineup.
The boost in cache size gives chips like the Ryzen 7 5800X3D or the Ryzen 7 7800X3D a massive upgrade in gaming. In fact, these chips defeat more expensive and more modern options from AMD and Intel in benchmarks, and this is despite their limited core counts. However, they’re not as good at productivity tasks, which is the price we pay for the lower core count.
Look out for Ryzen 9000 X3D CPUs later this year to steal the gaming top spot once again.
CPU labels and generations
Cores, threads, clocks … all of that stuff is pretty confusing, but then each manufacturer has to throw in its own naming schemes, and that can make things even more difficult to follow.
You can figure out a lot about a processor simply by knowing the generation it’s from and the tier it sits in within that generation. AMD and Intel have different naming schemes for their processors, and being able to decode them is important. Newer processors are usually better, and as we’ll explain throughout this guide, being able to discern processors on an individual basis will allow you to pick out what’s relevant and what isn’t.
The latest AMD processors are part of the Ryzen 9000 series. The first number notes the generation, while the second number notes where the processor sits in that generation. For example, the 9600X and 9700X both come from the Ryzen 9000 series, but the 9900X is a faster, more capable processor within that generation.
Unfortunately, the numbers themselves don’t mean much. You’d be forgiven, for example, for assuming that the Ryzen 9000 processors are the ninth generation of Ryzen processors. But that’s not the case (it’s actually the sixth generation of Ryzen processors and only the fifth architectural change). Similarly, the 9700X is labeled with the Ryzen 7 tag and the 9600X with the Ryzen 5 tag, while the 9900X has a more fitting Ryzen 9 tag.
It’s worth noting that AMD processors can come with or without an “X” at the end of the series number. The “X” simply indicates that the chip is a higher-performing version of the base processor. As such, you’ll see the Ryzen 5 7600 and the Ryzen 5 7600X, and the latter will be more expensive and slightly faster.
Intel’s naming scheme is similar, using the first number to note the generation and the second number to note the place within that generation. Like AMD, Intel also categorizes its processors into tiers (Core i7 and Core i9, as well as newer Core Ultra 5 and Core Ultra 7, for example). Knowing that, we can pick out the Intel 14900K as a 14th-generation processor that’s in the i9 tier. Again, higher is better here.
It’s a little trickier with the newer models. The Core Ultra 9 285K is from the 200-generation, and it’s a Core Ultra 9 (Core i9 equivalent), so it’s high-end. Higher is still better, whether it’s Core Ultra 5 and Core Ultra 7, or Core i5 and Core i7.
Intel also adds a suffix to most of its processors that notes certain functionality (or the lack of such functionality). There really isn’t any reasonable explanation for the suffix letters and what they mean, so we’ll just list them instead:
- G1-G7: Graphics level
- E: Embedded
- F: Requires discrete graphics
- G: Includes discrete graphics
- H: High performance optimized for mobile
- HK: High performance optimized for mobile, unlocked
- HQ: High performance optimized for mobile, quad-core
- K: Unlocked
- S: Special edition
- T: Power-optimized
- U: Mobile power efficient
- Y: Mobile extremely low power
Thankfully, you won’t encounter most of the suffixes when shopping for a processor. The important ones to remember are F and K for Intel desktop processors. For mobile, HK and U show up the most.
Integrated graphics
CPUs can also include integrated graphics chips on the same die, making them capable of operating independently of dedicated graphics cards. Intel CPUs with the F designation (such as the Core i5-13600KF) don’t have onboard graphics, but most others do in some form. They aren’t typically powerful, but an entry-level integrated graphics chip like Intel Arc Graphics can do around 60 frames per second in older esports games like CS: GO. You’ll want to keep the settings low to avoid stuttering frame rates during intense action or when heavy smoke is deployed.
AMD’s processors typically don’t include onboard graphics on desktops, though its latest generation Ryzen 7000 and 9000 do. There are also some accelerated processing units (APU) that have faster onboard graphics, but they’re quite niche. They can offer reasonable performance in indie and esports games, so for those on a tight budget, they can replace a discrete graphics card.
Power and thermals
Performance is the most important factor for most CPU purchases — after all, if you can’t do what you want with your new chip faster than you could before, what’s the point in upgrading? If you’re looking to have a quiet PC, an efficient PC, or one that’s particularly compact, power and thermal demands are important considerations, too.
Unfortunately, neither AMD nor Intel gives particularly clear data on the power and thermal demands of their processors, instead resorting to bundling the two together into a rating of Thermal Design Power (TDP). This is expressed in wattage, and it gives you a rough idea of how much power the CPU will require from the power supply and how capable a cooler you’ll need to keep it within safe operating temperatures.
Power consumption can vary greatly between different CPUs. In laptops, it’s usually kept at bay to ensure that the computer doesn’t heat up beyond the temperature of the sun; in desktops, manufacturers rely on you having an external cooler to improve PC cooling, and driving it up much higher. For instance, the Core i7-13650HX processor has a maximum turbo power of 157 watts, which is a lot for a laptop, but the desktop Core i9-14900K consumes 125W at its base power and can be boosted up to 253W, making it very hard to cool effectively, even with a big CPU cooler.
The newer Core Ultra 285K is much more efficient in gaming, but it can still pull ungodly amounts of power at times.
In certain situations, TDP can also be a slack guide to the status of a processor’s underlying silicon, where more proficient CPUs are ordered in the more leading TDP levels due to their capacity to manage extra power. This depends on each specific case, though, and there’s really no guarantee of a more high-grade chip. It’s also only especially suitable for overclocking.
You’ll want to examine individual processor reviews to determine how much power and cooling they actually need, but if you’re on the market for higher TDP CPUs that require almost 100W, larger and more proficient coolers would be a reasonable option if you want a quiet PC. The same applies to the power supply (PSU) — it’s one of those components you really don’t want to save money on.
Socket compatibility
Buying a processor can only get you so far — your PC build also needs a solid motherboard that holds all of these cool components together. This is where it gets tricky, though, because most CPUs only have a limited number of motherboards that they can fit into. This is referred to as socket compatibility, and this is also why you can’t upgrade your PC from 10 years ago with the latest CPU on the market — it simply doesn’t fit that motherboard anymore.
For AMD, there wasn’t much to consider for a good few years, because it stuck to its AM4 platform for a long time. You could upgrade your CPU several times within that time frame and not have to invest in a new motherboard. Now, however, the Ryzen 7000 and 9000-series requires the use of an AM5 motherboard. It also exclusively supports the newer DDR5 memory type, which can drive up the cost of building a PC depending on the speed an size of the kit you purchase.
Intel changes sockets a lot more frequently by comparison, and it currently utilizes the LGA1851 socket, which is compatible with Core Ultra 200 CPUs only. Its LGA1700 socket is still around, and works with the 12th, 13th, and 14th-Gen Intel CPUs. Where LGA1851 only works with DDR5, LGA1700 works with both DDR4 and DDR5 RAM, although you will have to make that choice before you make the purchase, as you usually can’t use both memory types in a single system.
When shopping for a CPU, double and triple-check that it fits that particular socket. Otherwise, you’re looking at a lot of money wasted on either a new motherboard or a new processor.
Cooling
Keeping your CPU cool is vital to the performance of your whole system. Allowing it to overheat can either massively slow down the performance of your computer or even severely damage your components. As such, while often overlooked, various CPU coolers are much more important than they might seem at first glance.
There are three common types of coolers: air coolers, all-in-one liquid coolers (AIO), and custom loop coolers. The former are the most common, and the latter are expensive, so you’ll only find them in high-end systems where the budget was of no concern.
Air coolers utilize heatsinks and one or multiple fans to cool down your CPU. They’re usually fairly cheap, and although they take up a fair amount of space, they’re relatively easy to install. AIO coolers rely on a liquid to transfer heat, but they too come with fans that help dissipate the heat. They’re much more efficient and are better suited to CPUs that consume a lot of power and generate a lot of heat. Lastly, custom loop is probably the best option of all three, but it’s pretty advanced and pricey — though maybe not as scary as you think.
Which CPU is best for you?
We’ve told you most of the things you need to know about desktop (and laptop) processors. The next step is for you to make the choice and buy a CPU that suits your particular needs.
There is no one-size-fits-all guide to making that decision. We have a guide on PC builds that can help you, and we have rankings of the best CPUs to show you some worthwhile models, but ultimately, every budget and use case is slightly different. However, if you’re unsure what works best for your particular PC, here are a few recommendations for different budgets and use cases.
Day-to-day use
Although CPU makers might want you to believe otherwise, you don’t need to spend hundreds of dollars on a CPU that won’t do a lot of heavy lifting. If you just need something that works well for browsing the internet, watching your favorite movies and shows, or perhaps even working, a cheap CPU will suffice. In those cases, the Intel Core i3-12100 or the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 are both good options.
The Core i3-12100F doesn’t come with integrated graphics, but the Ryzen 5 7600 does, so that saves you a bit of extra money on a GPU. However, don’t expect any serious gaming powers from either CPU; they’re made for casual users rather than gamers.
Gaming
If you want a universal recommendation for a gaming processor, the answer will always be either the Ryzen 7 5800X3D or the Ryzen 7 7800X3D. They’re both gaming beasts, outclassing nearly every other CPU out there in their respective generation, including models that cost a whole lot more. However, if you’re not into AMD or simply want something cheaper, there are still options to consider.
For Intel, the maximum CPU we’d recommend for gaming is the Core i7-14700K, and even then it’s a little overkill — you can safely settle for the cheaper Core i5-13600K instead. The Core i5-13400 is a budget-gaming champ, and it’s cheaper than the Ryzen 7 5800X3D, although it’s not as fast in gaming scenarios. Cheaper options that still do well in gaming include the Ryzen 5 5600 and the Core i3-12100F. The 14th-generation Intel CPUs are largely the same as their 13th-gen counterparts, so only pick them up if you get them at a good price.
We can’t really recommend the Core Ultra 200 CPUs for gaming, though. They’re worse than their older counterparts and are very inconsistent.
If you have the money to spare, nothing stops you from going for the top shelf and getting the Ryzen 9 7950X3D or the Core i9-14900K, but the 7800X3D is very close to both of them and costs a lot less.
Video editing and other CPU-heavy workflows
Buying a CPU for work is difficult — making the right choice is even more significant here than in other cases. If your work mostly revolves around the browser and Microsoft Excel, you can just refer back to our day-to-day section. However, if you tend to put your PC through the wringer for a living, you’ll need one of the best processors on the market.
Tasks like content creation, video editing, rendering, and encoding take a toll on the CPU. You’ll need a chip with a decent amount of cores and clock speeds to match. We recommend the Core i7-13700K as a starting point, but you can even upgrade to the Core i9-14900K if your budget can handle it. Alternatively, the newer 285K is usually better, but it’s quite inconsistent.
For AMD, the X3D chips are no good here — stick to the regular X-series processors from the latest Ryzen 9000 lineup. The Ryzen 7 9700X, Ryzen 9 9900X, and the Ryzen 9 9950X are all good options, although they all have fewer cores than their Intel counterparts.
Read the full article here
